HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Warner BBN 97 <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 18 Jul 1995 22:21:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
On Monday, Tony Buffa wrote:
>
>That year RPI was 16-5-1 and 13-2-1 in "NCAA EAST Varsity matches" and St
>Lawrence, the other NCAA team from the East was 17-5-0 and 9-3-0
>respectively.  Middlebury is on top of the list but was not selected, I
>think because of perceived weaker schedule.  RPI was 2nd in the east
>rankings, but there was Harvard, Williams, Colby, BC, Bowdoin between them
>and St. Lawrence.    I don't have a clue as to why St. Lawrence was
chosen over, say, Harvard.
 
        I don't either, but I'm wondering if Middlebury would have allowed
*themselves* to go even if they had been tabbed by the NCAA Selection
Committee (Did they even call themselves that in those days? I kind of doubt
it.) Anyway, the reason I'm bringing this up is a vague recollection I have
of a Hamilton College team of a few years back -- I don't remember what
sport, but I'm guessing basketball --  that qualified for a post-season
tournament but didn't go: either the league's by-laws or the school's forbade
them from participating in any sort of post-season play. I can't help but
wonder if Middlebury -- weak schedule aside -- might have been affected by
such a rule in '60-61.
 
 
--
C.C. Warner
Cambridge, Mass.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2