LISTSERV - HOCKEY-L Archives

HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	HOCKEY-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: ECAC scores, standings, and other stuffola
From:	Ralph Slate '91 <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Ralph Slate '91 <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 6 Mar 1995 21:42:20 GMT
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (19 lines)

In article <[log in to unmask]>,
Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>$ Union             6  12   4   16   70   87     9  15   4   22   98  111
>Dartmouth           7  13   2   16   80  111     9  16   2   20   95  136

>Union placed tenth due to their record against the top eight teams (5-7-4
>vs. 5-10-1 for Dartmouth).
>

I'm a little surprised that the ECAC doesn't use the number of wins
as a tiebreaker. If I was Dartmouth, I'd be feeling a little boned
here. In my book, a win and a loss is better than two ties.

Doesn't every other hockey league (non-NCAA) use # of wins as criteria?

Ralph
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.MAINE.EDU